McLucky FC

Sunday, July 02, 2006

Finally! An Opponent With A Team Name!

Mclucky FC Vs Soccerblues FC

Time: 3.00pm
Venue:Pasir Ris Crescent Secondary School
Weather: Sunny with scattered clouds

Starting Line-up:
Alex (GK), Chun Wei (DR), Zhang Wei (DC), Wei De (DC), Yang Teng (DL), Rayner (MC),
Siu Chun (MC), Sin Cheng (MC), Boon Wee (FL/R), Wei Chern (FC), Ben (FL/R)
**FL/R represents Left or Right Forward**

Substitutes: Bing De, Da Hao

Formation: 4-3-3

Pre Match

Anyone can fill me in on what happened before the match started? Other than warming up by playing "pig in the middle"? Yours truly woke up late on a sunny Saturday afternoon after being hypnotised by the football match between Italy and Ukraine at 3am. Watching the first half of the match was like watching paint dry, a fantastic remedy for insomniacs who simply cannot get to sleep. I arrived at the pitch just in time to catch the later moments of the first half, so anyone who wishes to add to the match highlights (and arrived a lot earlier than me) are highly encouraged to do so. Moving along...

Match Highlights

First Half

The first half saw Mclucky FC taking the lead through Wei Chern, who plants a firm header into the back of the net following a good delivery of the ball from the corner. 1-0 to Mclucky.

Siu Chun almost scores a second goal for Mclucky when he spots the keeper off his line and trys a 25-metre screamer from distance. The ball sails over the keeper's flailing arms but it hits the cross-bar and goes out of play.

The Soccerblues manage to secure an equalising goal soon after when they scramble the ball into the net after a frantic goal-mouth scramble. All square at 1-1.

The Mclucky lads then get a chance to take the lead in the closing moments of the first half when they are awarded a penalty after a Soccerblues defender was deemed to have held back Boon Wee while he was heading towards goal. Wei Chern steps up to take the spot kick but it is saved by the flamboyantly-clad Soccerblues keeper, who had been giving quite a reassuring performance throughout the first half. A goal each for both teams as the referee signals the end of the first half.

Second Half

The 4-3-3 formation adopted by Mclucky FC seems to be working well when they come out with all guns blazing in the second half. However, the forwards seemed to have left their scoring boots at home, unable to convert the numerous goal-scoring opportunities into actual goals. Credit must also be given to the Soccerblues defenders, who were quick to close down our forwards and deny them space to move or pass the ball into.

The inablity to score a crucial goal would prove to be Mclucky's undoing later in the second half when Kee Yong, the playmaker of the Soccerblues, curls a free-kick into the top right corner of the net from outside the penalty area. The Soccerblues take a 2-1 lead towards the end of the match.

The goal fired up the Mclucky lads, who stepped up a gear and tried to press for an equaliser, but were stopped in their tracks by the outstanding Soccerblues goalkeeper, who came off his line several times in the closing stages to thwart the threat of our on-rushing forwards. Tight defending by the opposition towards the end also made it hard for Mclucky to create any realistic goal- scoring opportunities. A hard-fought match where finishing proved to be the decisive factor. It ends 2-1 in favour of the Soccerblues.

Post Match

The 4-3-3 formation proved to be penetrating enough, but poor finishing cost us dearly. With better finishing, the match could have finished in our favour and by a much larger score-line. However, one can see that the ball movement between our own players has improved quite significantly when compared to our previous matches. Our players seem to be more composed when in possesion of the ball too, looking out for open team-mates to pass the ball to or simply passing the ball back into defence when they run short of options. Off-the-ball positioning has also improved, which along the formation, gives the forwards and midfielders more space to work with. Defenders were also quick to back-track and shadow opposing players making runs into our penalty box, limiting the opponents to long shots and high balls.

Now with the demerits. The 3-men midfield were often seen shifting out of position as the game progressed. Sin Cheng in particular, was most often seen drifting out of his position to move further up the pitch. Our triangular 3-men midfield became a 3-men "diagonal line" midfield in the end, with Rayner in danger of being over-worked as he had to cover the area left behind by Sin Cheng whenever the Soccerblues counter-attacked. More discussion is needed on this issue so all are welcomed to leave your comments! Don't be shy! "Just Shoot!"

With the 4-3-3 system, our forwards on the wings are encouraged to dribble and run with the ball to maximise their speed and agility advantage, but sometimes they are often caught too far up near the corner of the pitch with little or no options to pass the ball, resulting in them trying to take on 2 or more defenders on their own and more often than not, losing possesion of the ball in the process.
Perhaps in a situation like this, we could push our midfield slightly higher onto the pitch to support the wingers, or could we get our wing backs to be more adventurous and move beyond the half-way line to support the attack? Maybe this is the reason why Sin Cheng drifted out of postion so often during the match with the Soccerblues? To provide more options in attack? More discussion is also need on this topic. 不要客气,有话直说。

Player Ratings (flames not included...just honest comments...haha)

Alex:
Competent replacement for Kelvin, but could do better with his handling of ball when under pressure from opposing players. Thanks for coming!

Chun Wei:
Another reassuring performance at right back, but became largely anonymous when deployed as a forward as he did not use his pace and agility to their full advantage.

Zhang Wei:
Deputised in central defence as Wei De's partner and did well. Watched his man and shadowed him well. Was also on hand to clean up any loose balls in the penalty area, providing important backup to Wei De. Now we know he can play in any side of the defence.

Wei De:
Puts in effort week in, week out. A composed and imposing figure in defence, but should have helped Alex in organising the defence during set-pieces.

Yang Teng:
A newcomer in Mclucky FC. Often caught out of position (as described by Bing De in his "don't-stand-in-front-of-the-man-you-are-marking" comments earlier) whenever opponents attacked down his flank. Needs to communicate more with fellow midfielders and defenders to distribute defensive duties (ie: who marks who).

Rayner:
An excellent defensive midfielder with exceptional ball-winning skills. Provides an added attacking edge with his surging runs down midfield and has good vision to pick out fellow players with a long through-balls. Protects the defence well.

Sin Cheng:
Jekyll and Hyde performance. Attack-mindedness caused him to drift out of his midfield position often, leaving a gaping hole in midfield to be covered by the remaining midfielders. We all know you can do better, just like you did at Bishan. I want to see that sort of through passes again!

Siu Chun:
One of the best performances I have seen from him. Played accurate long balls for the forwards to chase. Has good vision and distributes the ball well, although his stamnia could be further improved to allow him to last a full game.

Boon Wee:
Made use of his pace and trickery to cause problems for the Soccerblues' defence. Could be better in his decision-making when faced with numerous markers by passing the ball back to open players nearby rather than trying to take on the defence himself.

Ben:
Similar to Boon Wee. Penetrating runs into the heart of the opponent's defence but made questionable decisions on several occasions with his decision to run and jink his way through defenders rather than making use of open team-mates nearby as the easier option.

Wei Chern:
Held the ball well as the target striker but still lacked physical presence upfront when compared to Alvin. A good header of the ball but is essentially still a creative midfielder who prefers to pass the ball and play-make rather than shooting on-sight.

Bing De:
Commanding and defensive-minded figure who can play either in defence or just in front of it. Has good tactical knowledge and reads the game well, allowing him to help out in organising the defence when opponents counter-attack.

Da Hao:
Has improved since I last saw him play. Should be more composed when he receives the ball in defence if there are no opposition players nearby. Playing a short pass to team-mates nearby is a better choice rather than just clearing the ball high up into midfield.

Mclucky's Man of the Match: Siu Chun

Quote of the Match:
"Bing De, you know you got 3 or 4 options to pass the ball to? etc etc..."
--- Siu Chun










16 Comments:

At 5:27 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

hahaha, no offence bingde, actually all things said during matches should not be taken seriously!

 
At 8:34 AM, Blogger W said...

Yea... Whatever happened on the pitch should remain there.

Everyone's still friends after the game.

 
At 8:38 AM, Blogger benny said...

If you didn't say it, I wouldn't have realised that we were playing against a team with a name we know of for the first time!

 
At 7:55 PM, Blogger Yao Zong said...

That quote was selected as quote of the match because it was the way in which Siu said it that was funny hahaha... with the exasperated look on his face. Relac relac, like i said, no flames included.

 
At 11:02 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

happy to see better passing in the team's play. but the defensive shape of the team is still not there, especially the attacking mids. need to drop back more to help out. there is always a very big hole in the mid field. Know it is no easy but i am sure we can do it. The defenders need to mark the player, not mark the ball, like wat bd always say, kan ren bu yao kan qiu. we are quite lucky as the opponents are not very strong and they failed to take advantage of our defence weakness. this week game will be harder, but I am very sure we will win it if we play well. all right guys, let us all work hard to be a better team!!!

 
At 4:12 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hope you all understand that centre midfield is a very difficult position to play in and I am still learning.Please feel free to comment and give suggestions on how to improve my game....Actually my suggestion is to play one defensive midfielder at the centre, and we can have 2 centre midfielders infront of the DM. One will support the left and vice versa. Defensive duties and attacking duties will be shared and during defending, there will be 3 midfielders back to help. Or in a case when one CM pushes up to assist in attack and is unable to backtrack in time for the counter attack, the other CM can be back, so this way we can have at least 2 midfielders back. Also, in this way, the AM need not support the 2 flanks which I believe is tiring. However, the shortcoming is that if the 2 CM is simultaneously attacking, our defence will be compromised. I think this situation will happen during set pieces esp. Pls comment as well.

 
At 4:12 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hope you all understand that centre midfield is a very difficult position to play in and I am still learning.Please feel free to comment and give suggestions on how to improve my game....Actually my suggestion is to play one defensive midfielder at the centre, and we can have 2 centre midfielders infront of the DM. One will support the left and vice versa. Defensive duties and attacking duties will be shared and during defending, there will be 3 midfielders back to help. Or in a case when one CM pushes up to assist in attack and is unable to backtrack in time for the counter attack, the other CM can be back, so this way we can have at least 2 midfielders back. Also, in this way, the AM need not support the 2 flanks which I believe is tiring. However, the shortcoming is that if the 2 CM is simultaneously attacking, our defence will be compromised. I think this situation will happen during set pieces esp. Pls comment as well.

 
At 4:37 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

yap, centre mid is definitely one of the hardest position to play, need to take care of both attach and defence. sin cheng's idea of 2 AMC and 1 DMC is a good suggestion but will only work if the team has a solid backline and that the left and right forward will come down to mid field to defend when our team is not attacking. if not there will always be a hole at the left wing or the right wing or even worse, at both wings. well, such a formation is definitely more offensive and could prove useful against weaker team but if the opponent are strong or has a midfielder with good passing ability, counter attacks will be launched against us rather frequently. Also, it requires the midfielder to be fitter as they have to run more. that is just how i think, hey wat u guys think, say leh!

 
At 4:47 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

maybe now we r playing a straight line midfield much like argentina wif 1 dm(mascherano) 1 cm(cambaisso) and 1 amc(riquelme)
think wat sincheng suggest is like we play like england midfield where there is 1 dm(heagreaves) and 2 cm(gerrard and lampard)

 
At 4:47 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

maybe now we r playing a straight line midfield much like argentina wif 1 dm(mascherano) 1 cm(cambaisso) and 1 amc(riquelme)
think wat sincheng suggest is like we play like england midfield where there is 1 dm(heagreaves) and 2 cm(gerrard and lampard)

 
At 5:30 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

The wae our team is playing, i think it's best to have 2 mc rather den 1 amc and mc. In the case, one of the amc can attack while the other supports from the back and if they is a need to, the other can push up to form 2 amc while the dm will become a mc. In ani case of a fast break by the opposing team, at least we will have 2 midfielders trying to break down the attack of the opponents. But this tactic requires a lot of teamwork from the wingers and fullbacks too.

 
At 5:50 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I feel with 4-3-3 we are still trying to fit a square peg into a round hole. Having some club experience I can say there will eventually come a point where either we truthfully recognise what our own weaknesses are and take the initiative to tell the captain how you wanna play, or just go on playing the way we do with a thick skin, with the captain respecting the harmony of the team enough to not make drastic changes.

What does 4-3-3 require?

Speedy, tricky, fit wingers who can operate high up on their own, often without support and can hold on to possession.

Reality: Our wing play was great when ball was worked between fullbacks - midfield - wingers. However, when left alone upfield, the attacks fizzled out.

3 in the center able to switch between attacking and defending effortlessly, fit enough to defend the center and the wings.

Reality: Man-management-wise, I think its evident what each of our strengths are, yet we are not using them well. The asymmetrical 3 men midfield does not fully liberate our strengths as all 3 has to attack and defend, and the shape is completely unintuitive to the players. Between defending the center, the wings, and supporting the center and wings during attack, even the best DMs and AMs would either be too tired or confused of their position to defend properly or too far from the wingers to support adequately.Thus in the end we may not make use of even the best DMs or AMs as they are lumped together in a ubiquitous and unintuitive 3 men midfield.

How would 4-2-3-1 be better?

This is where we must be frank with ourselves, while some are fucking unfit (like me! haha), some are poor passers, some are not as tricky as they think they are, we all can agree on this - we all play better when we play together, aka, help each other out.

We have great DMs, why not maximise their capabilities?

We suck at playing the balls out of defense. Our wingers play exceptionally well with support from midfield. So why throw men high up the pitch to face the opponent alone, when we proved we can play a good passing game in midfield, not to mention they can be a great outlet for our defense??

With our DMs, it could allow for the fullbacks to support in attack. Instead, what happen vs soccerblues was a culmination of two things:

1.When the wingers got the ball, the 3 men in midfield lost some positional discipline due to ubiquitous roles, unsure whether to support the flanks or go thru the center or defend.

2.The fullbacks , not only being unable to read the midfield, have difficulty supporting the wingers even if they could , due to how high up they were.

With DMs covering and wingers nearer to them, the attacking capabilities can be maximised.

With attacking fullbacks, a confident and well-allocated defensive backbone, better use of wingers. and overall less confusion and more teamwork, 4-2-3-1 would allow us to know our roles and play to our strengths.

 
At 6:30 AM, Blogger Yao Zong said...

good suggestion by siu... whose comments by the way have inspired me to come up with a tactic against next week's opponents (from damai sec)...I should be posting something up soon..then u guys can comment further on that

 
At 7:50 AM, Blogger benny said...

Like everybody has mentioned here, central midfield is definitely the problem area that we're facing now. The defence looked really solid, and it doesn't really feel like a one-man frontline too because I thought Wei Chern had plenty of support from the midfield throughout the match. Usually a marooned striker will just not see the ball at all, and that certainly wasn't the case on Saturday.

I'm going to second Siu's idea of a 2-man holding midfield tactic. Like I've mentioned before in another post, it allows a very secure blanket in front of our defence without our midfielders having to expend too much energy and stamina.

Because we actually pass the ball pretty well (wah self praise already), I think these 2 gentlemen won't have to run upfield too much to start and support an attack. Instead, those duties can be delegated to the attacking midfielder while the other two just hang back at just in front of the halfway line for example. It will then allow the fullbacks to push up and provide support for the wingers too.

Defensively, these 2 persons will then be able to cover whatever positions that were left behind as we attacked, like moving into the wide positions to stop their wingers. This will then allow our fullbacks time to run back and defend. The wingers and attacking midfielder will also track back accordingly so that they can receive the ball as soon as we break down that counterattack.

It has to be said that it requires tactical discipline not to run out of position or be caught flat in midfield though. I think that was what happened on Saturday. All 3 central midfielders ended up being too eager to join the attack sometimes and leaving that huge gap between midfield and defence. Attackers must also look for options behind too.

Actually, I have a lot more to say about this, but it's getting really long...Maybe I'll mail Weide or someone instead then it can be posted as an entry here.

In short, the system will have 6 defenders and 4 attackers.

 
At 8:32 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Bottomline, we cant have 3 idiots running around midfield trying to decide what to do. Who is AM who is DM 1 DM or 2DM or 1AM???!!?!?!@#$!@ 4-2-3-1 is just a rough guideline of how i think we can bring back certainty, solidity and confidence back into midfield. It plays to not only our strengths but also our weaknesses. Of course the "2" in 4231 are very welcomed to attack and more often than not they are needed. The most important is we need the assurance that not only do we know our roles, we know that the best possible person is playing in their respective roles. 3 idiots wont work. hahaha

 
At 8:04 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

i will wear my scoring boots for the next match!

 

Post a Comment

<< Home